Can A Bedazzler Be Used With Tulle

October 25, 2008






And if all aim was to destroy knowledge? These are critical days for Italy's future, because the government has had the excellent idea of \u200b\u200bcutting the non-cuttable, education (for the umpteenth time). Which is nothing if not the root development, the future and survival of the country.
The point is this: the future members of parliament do not care. Conversely affects the present (their present). They would like to face a future that is increasingly competitive with fewer opportunities to do research? Well, a vision that moves .... If we look at the university, we are talking about big cuts: € 63.5 million in 2009, 190 million in 2010, € 316 million for 2011, € 417 million for 2012, € 455 million for 2012. with significant risks for many universities have to raise taxes or to close. Identical with the result that it will pay the city. Relief then comes from the private, that can (and is widely favored in doing so, with very high tax benefits) to invest in the University, transforming it into a foundation. What does this mean? It means that the private investing, will rightly take advantage of it, it will mean that the poles that are located in developed areas and rich in capital (eg Milan, Turin) will prosper, while many other universities, without investment, and companies able to do so, close . Or in any case who will be able to pay the privilege of choosing the best teachers, the best technology, the highest research, creating a division series A, series B based solely on matters of capital. In all this where is the state? The state should guarantee all citizens the opportunity to invest in their future and to defend the right to education without distinction should, in fact. The justification for the movement from the word go waste: it is necessary to reduce waste. Difficult not to agree. But cutting and waste are not synonymous, neither are the neighbors: remove resources is not mathematically remove waste.
But it is obviously a good mirror to feed as a justification: when they start really, not just propaganda in order to cut their high salary and then all of the corollary benefits? Obvious answer: never. It would not be sufficient in itself, a statement of intent. What then, in hindsight, the state seems to find money when something in their opinion, deserves the loan to Alitalia is an easy example. That money could not be saved by avoiding cuts in education and giving the national airline to Air France that would have taken it all? The rigmarole of the need to preserve the Italian-owned company does not want to hear it again ... another smoke and mirror Last but not the end, the Prime Minister goes back on things, obviously giving the blame to the left: but if the ears work, there are few excuses. Fortunately, the Internet has the great merit of allowing information and to contradict the denials of the Prime Minister: