Today I present to you for months that the shoe is my shoe "every day", initially used in the shop and later in the day: Nike LunarGlide. In this post I will speak specifically of Lunarglide2 +, but I will make some reference and comparison with the first version of this shoe.
First of all, thanks. This shoe I won a competition to Nike Italy this summer, and if I have it is thanks to all my friends (which I hated) who voted for my project on Facebook. I was not able to fly to America to train a week in Oregon, but we say that this was in any case a great gift. Thank you all! J
Then, details of the shoe: it is not on the market. This chart I've drawn I NIKEiD through the application, which lets you choose the colors of the shoe and make some customization (Tamarra, instead of the Nike logo on the tab I entered my date of birth). It was possible to choose the width of the plant and the softness dell'intersuola, for the most demanding.
Back to the shoe: if you go into a shop and take in hand, you will feel very light. I emphasize "appears" because in reality you hold 337gr (43eu). The upper is very soft and do not even have a visible seam. The LG2, from previous, present in the central part of the upper part very thin and soft, reinforced Flywire visual elements that make it more solid. The shell bead is not too rigid and is in sight.
The sole is flat, as many of the latest Nike products, and there seems to be very "heel." Under the sole in sight technology Lunar (check the yellow between the cracks).
We have a hand in the shoe and feel that even here there are no seams: in this model is what I call "sock" that is the union of the tab with the rest of the shoe.
we put the shoe and the NikeAddicted like me, feel certainly different. It is less embracing of the other models and the instep is much higher (I personally hold it to be very good with the foot stopped). Another difference, the Lunar technology will be more rigid at first glance the classic that gave Air soft simply standoci above.
We get the point. This evening I decided to test in progress. I plan on the iPod a run of 30 minutes (ah, I forgot, of course, is Nike + compatible) and childbirth. The uncertainty on the differential of the shoe, which is essentially the difference between the thickness of back and front of the system midsole + sole, is now confirmed: every little climb is long standing and difficult struggle a bit more. The weight is presented in its real form, resulting so a true A3. The cushioning is better than feared, in the end does its job well, the stability is excellent, even for those used for the first time a shoe as "alternative" plan in the shoe works well and no problems, the Dynamic Support (a sort of small insert pronators light) does not bother and works without being noticed.
Maybe I was not accustomed to this type of shoe, maybe I was tired after a day of work, maybe not know, but I feel that the roller is not the best: shoe falls flat on the ground, the foot even more tiring. But this is a personal thing.
Final considerations: the shoe is good, but I think that those who choose it must start with the idea to take some time to get used to the newness, the low differential stress, which leads me to advise against those who have problems with your Achilles tendon, and the advice of a neutral or light pronators, given the small support, and who usually uses Asics and Mizuno, from a standpoint of fit. Currently I have
riallargato laces making the knot behind the insole to re-use them in everyday life. Here, it is also an excellent athletic shoe, comfortable but without the mesh from "trainer", to use to go out shopping, go to college, go to work for an evening of pizza + movie at home with friends. In this case, I have extensively tested and have passed all these tests with flying colors.
0 comments:
Post a Comment